Nuclear War Simulator
LINK ===> https://byltly.com/2tkFsP
In 1986, a commercial nuclear power plant in Chernobyl, Ukraine, exploded from a fatal cocktail of human error and outdated design flaws. Thirty-one people either lost their lives from the initial explosion, they succumbed to severe burns, cardiac arrest, or the effects of radiation exposure.
Chernobyl has become a test lab forecasting what could happen if another immense explosion or act of nuclear terrorism befalls us. Most of the animals still living and breeding there have and continue to pass on gene mutations. If something radioactive eats something else radioactive ... you get where this is going.
Nuclear winter is one such aftereffect that keeps on killing long after the fires have died down. The opposite of the greenhouse effect, a nuclear winter happens when so much ash and smoke gets into the atmosphere that sunlight is unable to penetrate. Without a source of heat, temperatures plummet, and plants are incapable of photosynthesis. Anything that depends on plants for survival will end up dying off, and from there, the effects creep higher and higher in the food chain. Many scientists believe there was a similar effect from the asteroid that ultimately extinguished the dinosaurs.
This is why we need technology like NWS. Though Stepanov is still editing the software to thoroughly figure out the duration of a possible nuclear winter and account for other calculations and consequences, it should still be released early next year. More advanced versions could surface in the future as he receives feedback. To take a stand against nuclear war, support ICAN and IPPNW.
The fallout of nuclear war is the premise for all sorts of films and video games. There is a sort of morbid curiosity to imagining what life would be like in a post-apocalyptic world caused by this type of warfare, but the threat of such an occurrence is anything but science fiction. To better understand exactly how devastating to the planet and the population that a global nuclear could cause, there's Nuclear War Simulator.
One way to imagine Nuclear War Simulator is like a version of Google Earth with a nuclear option. With a couple clicks, you can find out what the fallout of a conflict between two nuclear superpowers would be, from casualties caused to the long-term effects that follow, including nuclear fallout and radiation levels. The simulator puts you in full control of the experience, allowing you to design your own nuclear forces, establish attack plans and explore potential conflict scenarios and even push to see just how many weapons a nation could produce if they decided to put the full force of their military and economy behind it. Along the way of seeing how these scenarios play out, the Nuclear War Simulator also lets you determine what your chance of survival would be in a nuclear holocaust, based on your location and how the attacks would play out.
While initially conceived of as a game, there is no winning in this nuclear war, and no set or measurable objectives. There are, instead, an array of menus of weapons, delivery vehicles, launch patterns, and sequencing, allowing users to explore just what it looks like when, say, a slight exchange of a couple nuclear warheads escalates into a planet-shattering conflagration of ICBM flights and submarine launches and fallout and casualties.
That downwinder experience, of being a person who grew up exposed to the after-effects of nuclear tests, is an often-obscured part of the story of nuclear testing. The harmful effects uttered by downwinders are twice a tragedy: first, the harms directly experienced, and second, that they were harmed by nations actively preparing for a civilization-shattering cataclysm.
Computer modeling of nuclear exchanges is one way to truly visualize the scale of the weapons, and the way their use inevitably creates a tragedy on a scale that is almost impossible to imagine otherwise.
Nuclear war simulator is a detailed realistic simulation and visualization of large-scale nuclear conflicts with a focus on humanitarian consequences. It lets you design conflict scenarios and estimate the consequences using a population density map and realistic weapons effects.
Nuclear War Simulator is a detailed realistic simulation and visualization of large-scale nuclear conflicts with a focus on humanitarian consequences. There are currently over 13000 nuclear weapons on this planet of which over 9000 are in military stockpiles. This software should help you answer the question: what will happen if Russia and the United States or India and Pakistan use their arsenalsYou can design warheads, missiles and carries, place them on the map and execute attack plans to tell a credible story about how nuclear conflicts play out and what are the consequences. Using a high-resolution population density map and realistic weapons effects like blast, heat and radiation you can make an estimate of how many people will die in a conflict.
Let us assume that North Korea has 25 operational nuclear weapons and that when under attack, it decides to launch its entire arsenal against both Seoul and Tokyo. The warhead yield ranges from 15 to 250 kilotons (current and possible future capabilities) and are timed for airburst at optimal altitude. Based on these assumptions, seven scenarios were run, one for each of the seven different warhead yields.
There are dozens of variables in calculating the potential effects of nuclear detonations on population centers. One can run countless simulations with many combinations of these variables with a wide range of results [12]. For simplification purposes, the calculations in this simulation are based on traditional population vulnerability due to blast overpressure [13]. The blast areas for the seven weapon yields were calculated using the Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer [14].
Naturally, no missile system is 100 percent reliable. The US Minuteman III ICBM, the most tested missile in its arsenal, is listed as having a test reliability of nearly 100 percent [19]. However, as with all weapon systems, its operational reliability is probably less. Moreover, South Korea has deployed one THAAD battery to help protect against a North Korean missile attack and Japan is in the process of acquiring the Aegis Ashore ABM system. Therefore, not all 25 North Korean nuclear missile warheads will detonate on their targets. Three levels of probability of detonation were used in calculating casualties: 20, 50 and 80 percent.
In 2017, a group of Princeton researchers gathered in a conference room to work on war simulations for an exhibition about the peril of nuclear weapons. They called the project Plan A. At the time, then-President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un were inching up rhetoric around nuclear weapons, and people were feeling uneasy. Instead of looking east, the researchers created a scenario that focused on Europe. Later, they produced a four-minute YouTube video describing their simulation.
The scenario starts with a dispute between NATO and Russia, with Russia launching a nuclear warning shot from a base near the city of Kaliningrad. NATO responds with a single tactical nuclear air strike. Russia then sends 300 nuclear warheads and short-range missiles to target NATO bases, and NATO responds with 180 warheads, killing 2.6 million people.
UN intervention/mediation: this corresponds to attempts of UN to influence both countries in finding common ground and mediating political negotiations between both countries, but it also entails deliberations and actions that can be taken by UN's Security Council in the case of military conflict between the two countries or of nuclear weapons being used. 59ce067264
https://www.physics-n-maths-nerd.com/forum/general-discussions/best-place-to-buy-andersen-windows